Navy’s new corvette, INS Kavaratti, shows why time and cost overruns are endemic to warship projects - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad

Breaking

Thursday 22 October 2020

Navy’s new corvette, INS Kavaratti, shows why time and cost overruns are endemic to warship projects


By Ajai Shukla

Business Standard, 22nd Oct 20

 

When Chief of Army Staff, General Manoj Mukund Naravane, commissions Indian Naval Ship (INS) Kavaratti in Visakhapatnam on Thusday, it will mark the end of Project 28 – one of the Indian Navy’s most ambitious, most delayed and most budget-busting warship projects.

 

Project 28, which envisioned building four indigenous anti-submarine corvettes at Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers, Kolkata (GRSE), will end four years later than planned. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) approved it in 2003 and the first corvette was to be delivered in 2012, with the other three following at one-year intervals.

 

Project 28 has also overshot its budget by more than 250 per cent. The project’s sanctioned cost was Rs 2,700 crore, but will end up costing over Rs 7,000 crore.

 

Project 28 illustrates why time and cost overruns are endemic to most Indian warship building projects. A central reason is the navy’s operational assessment that it is better to get a warship late and over-budget than to get one that is technologically overmatched by potential adversaries.

 

Project 28 also suffered significant delays because the navy insisted on indigenizing each corvette to the maximum extent possible. GRSE told Business Standard that INS Kavaratti will have achieved an unprecedented indigenization level of 90 per cent.

 

Delay began even before construction did, with the navy deciding that Project 28 corvettes would be the first Indian warships to be constructed from indigenous warship-grade steel. The Steel Authority of India’s Bhilai steel plant eventually developed the so-called DMR249A steel. But that involved a two-year delay.

 

Then, after INS Kamorta and INS Kadmatt – the first two corvettes – joined the fleet in 2014 and 2016 respectively, the navy ambitiously decided to build the remaining two corvettes’ superstructures with composite materials to make them lighter and, therefore, faster. In addition, warships built from composites reflect radar far less than steel, making them harder to detect.



This meant going to Kockums of Sweden for materials and to learn construction with composites, causing another year of delay.

 

On the positive side, this resulted in the weight of the third and fourth corvettes – INS Kiltan and Kavaratti – being reduced from 3,150 tonnes to just 3,000 tonnes. These corvettes now cleave through the seas at a pacy 46 kilometres per hour (kmph) and have a patrol endurance of 6,400 km at a speed of 33 kmph.

 

Further delay was caused because of the determination to indigenize as many systems and sub-systems as possible. Vendors had to be developed even in the complex areas of sensors and weapons, where import content is usually high.

 

GRSE says INS Kavaratti will field a 76 millimetre Otomelara gun built by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd, while Larsen & Toubro has built its heavyweight torpedo tubes and rocket launchers. Ordnance Factory, Ambarnath manufactures the Kavach chaff launchers that serve as decoys for incoming missiles. Bharat Electronics Ltd has built most of the sensors and combat management systems in INS Kavaratti.

 

Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd (KOEL) has built the four diesel engines that power the Project 28 corvettes, while Cummins and Kirloskar Electric have engineered the 3 megawatt generators that supply electricity on-board.

 

Remarkably, the expertise that GRSE and its sub-vendors have accumulated in designing and manufacturing a world-class anti-submarine corvette will now wither, since there are no more orders for such warships. Instead, the navy is evolving a design for the so-called “Next Generation Corvette”. 

 

Major navies evolve a successful warship design and then achieve economy of scale by building them in large numbers, with only incremental changes to the basic design. The US Navy has built 82 destroyers of the successful Arleigh Burke-class and China is following the same approach with its latest Type 055 Renhai-class destroyers. 


7 comments:

  1. Mumbai and other coastal towns would require helicopters like HAL built Dhruv and ALH. These stealth boats could be used for counter terrorism operations by coast guards to prevent another MUMBAI LIKE attack.

    ReplyDelete
  2. NSR says ---

    USA built the very formidable Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers for a long time...
    These destroyers are getting converted to air and missile defense tasks too...
    USA effort to upscale to a bigger and stealthier, and more advanced technology Zumwalt class Destroyers became a debacle...
    So USA again building and trying too improve Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers...

    So it must serve as a great learning lesson for India...
    India must build these Corvettes, and Shivalik Class Destroyers, and one heavy Frigate and a heavy cruiser entirely in India with Indian systems in a serial production...
    The technology and systems upgrades must be based on their functionality only...

    Keep building what you can for now... and step up when you are ready in increments...

    Great article...

    ReplyDelete
  3. We can't say for sure if the newly built ships are world class. The Arihant was launched with fanfare but now questions surround its reliability. Was it damaged by a dumb accident (leaving the hatch open) or defective from the start?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kilometers doesn’t quite cut it at sea. Please use Knots and Nautical Miles which are the accepted units worldwide. Otherwise, as usual, a great article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I only switched to km because readers said they weren’t familiar with nautical miles and knots!🥴

      Delete
  5. Looks like Russia is going to be neutral much longer; it is thinking to make alliance with China. What do you think about that, since India is still heavily dependent on Russia military equipment?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is exporting the Corvettes an option ?. Seems extremely wasteful not utilizing the technological know how learned in building theses corvettes.
    PS if possible you should use nautical units and mention KM in brackets for the layman.

    ReplyDelete

Recent Posts

<
Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last