Monday, 6 July 2015

First Tejas Mark II engine to arrive in September

US refusing to cooperate on Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft engine, defence ministry floating global tender

By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 6th July 15

The plan to develop a more powerful, modernized version of the current Tejas fighter is getting a welcome boost. In September, US engine-maker General Electric (GE) plans to deliver the first F-414INS6 engine (hereafter F-414), which will power the Tejas Mark II.

The F-414 engine’s maximum power output of 98 kiloNewtons (kN) will make the Tejas Mark II faster and nimbler than the current Mark I fighter, which gets just 84 kN of peak power from its GE F-404IN engine. The F-414 will also provide the burst of power needed for the Naval Tejas to take off from an aircraft carrier deck on just 200 metres of runway.

In 2010, the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), which manages the Tejas programme, chose GE over Eurojet to supply 99 engines for the Tejas Mark II. Of these, 16 are being delivered fully-built, so that ADA can build prototypes of the Mark II fighter for ground and flight test programmes.

Meanwhile, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) will establish a facility to manufacture the remaining 83 engines in Bengaluru. With the Indian Air Force (IAF) and navy likely to order at least 160 Tejas Mark II fighters, the HAL facility could eventually build about 700 engines (assuming a fighter uses 3.5 engines in its service life).

For now, ADA is welcoming the arrival of the first F-414 engines. This will allow it to start building the first Mark II prototype, which it plans to fly within three years, i.e. by 2018-19. ADA says it will hand over the first production fighter to the IAF within six years, i.e. by 2021-22.

Presently, HAL Bengaluru is building the first 20 Tejas Mark I fighters, which were contracted in 2007. In 2010, the IAF committed itself to another 20 Mark I fighters, which will be contracted when the Tejas gets final operational clearance, probably by March 2016. These 40 fighters will use the F-404 engine.

Not everyone believes the Tejas Mark II, powered by the F-414, is a good idea. Aerospace experts like Pushpinder Singh of Vayu Magazine say the benefits of the more powerful F-414 would be negated by its additional weight and the re-design of the Tejas that they say will be needed to accommodate the engine.

Experts also argue the Tejas’ constricted air intake will prevent the F-414 from sucking in the air it requires, even with extensive redesign. In that case, the engine would not deliver its rated 98 kN thrust.

Rejecting this view, GE and ADA officials say they will accommodate the F-414 without problem or extensive redesign, and that it will perform to its designed potential.

Their claim is supported by the engine data on the GE website (see graphic below), which indicates the F-414 is no larger than the F-404. Nor is it significantly heavier, says ADA.

General Electric engines: comparison
F-414 Enhanced Engine
Thrust84 kN98 kN116 kN
Length391 cm391 cm391 cm
Airflow70 kg/sec77.1 kg/sec85 kg/sec
Max diameter89 cm89 cm89 cm
Inlet diameter71 cm79 cm79 cm
Pressure ratio28:130:130:1
(Source: General Electric official website)

While GE has bagged the deal to supply India the F-414, an even bigger prize could prove elusive --- the supply of a more powerful version of the F-414 for the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), a fifth-generation medium fighter that ADA plans to develop, with the IAF standing ready to buy 200.

As this blog reported (June 1, “Carter to face Indian demand for engine technology”) the defence ministry has asked the United States to let the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) work with GE in jointly upgrading the F-414 to a rating of 110 KN of peak power. ADA believes the AMCA needs 220 kN of peak power from its twin engines.

This is welcomed by GE, which had earlier worked for the US Navy on upgrading the F-414 to a 116 kN engine designated F-414 Enhanced Engine. With that project now shelved, GE would like to see it revived with Indian partnership, funding and a large assured market.

Yet, Washington is stonewalling the Indian request, even though the two countries had established a “joint working group” to explore cooperation in engine design during President Obama’s visit to India in January.

A disappointed Indian defence ministry is now issuing a global tender, inviting aero engine firms to co-develop a suitable engine with the DRDO.

Senior defence ministry sources say that Eurojet, the European consortium whose EJ200 engine lost out to GE’s F-414 in the contest to power the Tejas Mark II, has satisfied the DRDO it can uprate the EJ200 to 110 kN.

Snecma, the French company that builds the Rafale’s M-88 engine, will also be issued a tender. However the M-88, which currently generates 75 kN of thrust, cannot be uprated beyond 105 kN.

“Fighters are designed around a pre-selected engine. We will issue the tender quickly and select an engine for the AMCA so that the programme does not get delayed. If Washington chooses to deny India engine technology by preventing GE from working with the DRDO, that will have its own implications”, says a top defence ministry official.


Anonymous said...

When it comes to ToT, USA is worse than Russia. Had India selected the EF over Rafale, by now not only the first jets would've been rolling off the production line, we would also have jet engine technology. Every defense order has massive bungling (by design?) where India ends up paying the maximum price.

rajendra said...

What will they do with the engine.. when the aircraft will take another 6yrs to fly.....

Anonymous said...

Why is the HAL and DRDO not considering a Russian engine like the RD-33MK ? The Russian engine may not be on par with F414 Enhanced Performance in spec or even the EJ200 but it is more likely that the Russians would share its technology and it would be cheaper to build compared to the American or European engines.

Jean Luc Picard said...

1. With the new GE 414 Engines producing 98KN thrust and the Tejas Mk 2's weight what will be Tejas MK 2's Thrust weight Ratio ?

For this we will need to know what is the weight delta between Mk 1 and Mk 2 excluding engine weight.

In my unqualified opinion, Tejas's primary role will be 'Fleet Air defense'. Quick to the air, lightly armed and intercepting in numerical superiority any incoming airborne threats.
sort of like a nimble, first-responder to an incident.

Being a light Fighter, If the thrust weight ratio is not 1.09 or greater when armed for 'Interceptor' or Air To Air CAP role then it potentially may be a cause of concern. As its not an escorted aircraft, and being lightly armed may be required to engage in close air combat requiring good thrust weight ratio.

Maybe the expert from Vayu Magazine or Ex IAF folks can shed light.

2. We really need to learn and invest in Engine development capability. Almost all of our 'indigenous' weapons programmes, in its very core have Foreign engines. MoD must realize that engine technology is a VITAL step towards self reliance and a capability that any aspiring major power must have.

Guru said...

One key parameter that you missed was the dry thrust rating which at 68KN for the F414 is approx 30% higher than the 51KN for the F404. While wet thrust would be critical for taking off from an Aircraft Carrier, it is dry thrust which will sustain the aircraft throughout flight and enable it to cruise at a higher speed/carry more armament.

Anonymous said...

According to powerplant that is F404IN20 give 9,130kgf thrust that is equivalent to 89KN....and here u said 85KN....which one is correct....

Karthik Kakoor said...

The designing needs to be done around the power plants !!! Only after an engine derivative is freezed can the base work start for the project :)

Somashekar Janardan said...

I feel it is better to accept higher costs and go with EuroJet's EJ200 Tranche 3 engine with TVC nozzles for AMCA project! There are many stringent requirements for a 5th gen fighter's engine and EuroJet EJ200 will meet all of them and provide 110KN Max. Wet Thrust also I feel..